Home » Stat 300 – fall 2016 – assignment

Stat 300 – fall 2016 – assignment








STAT 300 – Fall 2016 – Assignment # 2



(Answers need to be accompanied by the cover sheet provided in the course website.)


(1) (18 marks) Read the first three sections of the following article:


Ma-Kellams, C. and Blascovich, J. (2012): Enjoying life in the face of death: East–West differences in responses to mortality salience. Journal of Person-ality and Social Psychology,103No.5, 773-786


We restrict attention here to “study 3” in the article. Familiarise yourself with that study.


(a)   Describe briefly but clearly the motivation for the study.


(b)   Describe what you can about the experimental conditions in the study.


(c)   Define clearly the response variable.


(d)   Is Figure 3 in the article an informative way to display the data? Justify your thinking. Suggest a graphical approach that would have been more informative.


(e)   Which effects, if any, did the researchers conclude affect the response for this study?


(f ) Suppose the data for this study were as given in the file “Ass216Q1.xls” on the course website. Create a suitable graphic to explore the effects of interest. Comment on your plot.


(g)   Perform an analysis of variance on the data provided. Summarise your conclusions clearly.

(h)   List the matching learning outcomes assessed in the three parts above, for this ques-tion. (Learning Outcomes are posted in the Course Information folder.)


(2)   (11 marks) A research assistant recorded the lifetimes of twenty guinea pigs who resided in a laboratory. The lifetimes in months are recorded below:























(a)   Create a graphic that illustrates the shape of the distribution of the data above. Com-ment on the shape.


(b)   Applying the Central Limit Theorem, find an estimate of the standard deviation of the sample mean in this example and hence create a 95% confidence interval for the population mean. What reservations might you have about this estimate?


(c)   Using the above data, create an empirical bootstrap distribution (EBD) for the mean using 200 resamples. Create a histogram to illustrate your EBD, and comment on its shape.


(d)   Use your EBD to find a 95% bootstrap confidence interval for the mean. Describe your


steps clearly. Writing your estimate in the form (x¯ ¡ a, x¯ Åb) , comment on how your interval estimate differs from the one in (b).


(e)   Use your EBD to find an estimate of the standard deviation of the sample mean here. Compare your value with that used in (b).


(3)   (8 marks) A researcher has a dataset comprised of scores on three exams for a group of 350 students. The exams, each of which is scored out of 100 points, test mathematical reasoning (MATH), verbal reasoning (VRBL), and general knowledge (GNRL), respectively. The scatterplots that describe the data are given in the course website.


Not knowing much about statistics, the researcher imports the data into a statistical soft-ware package, and starts pushing buttons. He ends up with the three fitted models whose output is given in the course website, but he is not sure what to make of the results.



(a)   Which of the three analyses of the data above address the question of whether MATH and VRBL scores might be associated with each other, amongst students with com-mon GNRL score? Do the data provide evidence that there is such an association, or are they consistent with a lack of association? Justify your answers.


(b)   Give an estimate and 95% confidence interval for the increase in average MATH score that corresponds to a 20 point increase in VRBL score, amongst students with the same GNRL score. Also, give an estimate and 95% confidence interval for the in-crease in average VRBL score that corresponds to a 3.2 point increase in MATH score, amongst students with the same GNRL score.

(c)   It turns out that the researcher also ends up fitting a fourth model, whose output is also given in the course website.


There happens to be a second group of 100 students writing these exams, and it is reasonable to regard these students as coming from the same population as the first group. In fact, the second group has already written the GNRL and VRBL tests, and the researcher has these scores. They have not yet written the MATH test though.


The Department wants to pro–actively offer remedial resources and support to stu-dents who might need extra help in preparing for the test. Describe how you think the researcher should go about identifying which students might benefit most from this support.


(4)   (3 marks) Complete the online midterm exam wrapper questionnaire accessed via the link given in the course website.


This activity is designed to give you a chance to reflect on your midterm exam perfor-mance and, more importantly, on the effectiveness of your exam preparation. Please answer the questions sincerely. Your responses are collected to inform the instructional team (instructors & TAs) regarding students’ experiences surrounding this exam and how they can best support your learning. Summarized results will be shared with the class.






































Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more