Discussion 5.1: Case Analysis: Dietz v. Finlay Fine Jewelry
Read Dietz v. Finlay Fine Jewelry, 754 N.E. 2d 958 (Ind. App. 2001) on page 650-652 in your textbook. Post your answers to question 1 through 4 found at the end of the case. Dou you agree with this decision? Support your answer with additional cases or research, if you wish. I will need references. I will need about 250-350 words.
1.) What were the legal issues in this case? What did the court decide?
2.) What was the basis of Dietz’s privacy tort claim? Her infliction of emotional distress claim? Why were they rejected?
3.) What was the basis of her false imprisonment claim? Her defamation claim? Why was she allowed to go to trial on them? Is she likely to prevail at trial?
4.) What, if anything, should this employer do differently?
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more